Viridor the preferred bidder for Cardiff Bay incinerator shortlisted for Oxford incinerator

BBC NEWS | England | Oxfordshire | Waste incinerator companies named
The companies shortlisted to build a waste incinerator in Oxfordshire are named.
Viridor Waste Management proposes to a site at Ardley in Bicester, while the Waste Recycling Group chose Abingdon's Sutton Courtenay as its location.
A spokesman for Oxford Friends of the Earth said the county council's decision to tender a contract for the incinerator flies in the face of public opposition and sound environmental policy.

Councillors to visit other waste sites
Norwich Evening News - Norwich,England,UK
Councillors who will make a decision on whether to build an incinerator in Norfolk are to visit three plants to see how other counties are finding a way ...
Rob Whittle, from campaign group NAIL2 (Norfolk Against Incineration and Landfill), said the councillors should visit a plant which combined MBT with anaerobic digestion, even though there is not one currently operating in the country.

He said: “There is a plant which uses anaerobic digestion in Ludlow and ones which have both in Germany. If they really want to get a rounded view then they should go to Germany. I think the visits they are currently doing will skew the process from the start and smooth the way for the incinerator operators.”

Greenwashing index - any suggestions?

http://www.greenwashingindex.com/
Welcome to the Greenwashing Index — home of the world’s first online interactive forum that allows consumers to evaluate real advertisements making environmental claims. “Going green” has become mainstream for businesses large and small — and that’s a good thing. What’s not so great is when businesses make environmental marketing claims that can be misleading. The intent of this Web site is to:

Help consumers become more savvy about evaluating environmental marketing claims of advertisers;
Hold businesses accountable to their environmental marketing claims; and
Stimulate the market and demand for sustainable business practices that truly reduce the impact on the environment

MBT approved in Pontypool in spite of huge local oposition

This application was approved inspite of presentations which highlighted: no viability, lack of need, public perception of harm, weight of public opposition and traffic concerns as Material Planning Considerations....

letsrecycle.com

MBT approved in Wales in face of local opposition letsrecycle.com, UK - 7 Feb 2008 Plans to build a mechanical biological treatment plant in South Wales have been given the green light - despite fierce local opposition. ...

MRW	Shanks planning application gets green light MRW, UK - 7 Feb 2008 Shanks managing director Ian Goodfellow said: “We feel that Shanks MBT technology will go a long way to ensuring that South East Wales region is capable of ...

Shanks MBT plant in South Wales is intended to resemble the company's existing MBT facility in Dumfries, above Torfaen borough council has approved an application by waste firm
Shanks to build a facility capable of processing 120,000 tonnes of residual waste a year at its site on the Pontyfelin Industrial Estate in Pontypool.

Subject to conditions such as only treating municipa l waste generated in South Wales, the application would see Shanks turning residual waste into Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF).residual wate, Shanks already produce SRF at facilities in East London and Dumfries and recently agreed a new contract to provide it as fuel to construciton giant Castle Cement. The MBT planning application was submitted as a speculative gesture by Shanks to support a future bid for a forthcoming residual waste management contract in Torfaen, which is expected to be procured in
partnership with Blaenau Gwent council.

However, the planning proposal has generated opposition from locals who have voiced fears over health issues related to the site's former use as a hazardous waste incinerator, when it was owned by Rechem International Ltd.
Other objections - over noise, traffic and pollution - were submitted by Pontypool Community council and a letter of objection countersigned by 500 different addresses raised concerns that MBT was too expensive and would land residents with hefty council tax bills.
The letter said: "MBT is expensive. Cumbria County Council has agreed a 25 year £400,000,000 MBT contract with Shanks. We should be extremely cautious about committing this level of Council Tax revenue."
Approval of this planning application does not confirm any preference for the council's method of dealing with waste in future
Torfaen council Summing up its reasons to approve the facility, however, Torfaen
council said that it was aware of "the sensitivities in relation to the site due in the past activities", but that these should not affect the new application.
In the meeting report from February 5, the council said: "The council, as the local planning authority, have to judge the merits of the current proposal, not the previous operation of the site."
The council added that the issue over expense to council taxpayers was irrelevant because it was not signing a contract with Shanks but only approving a facility.
It said: "The decision to be taken on this planning application is not one of procurement; it is to determine whether this building and process is appropriate in land use terms on this particular site and compliant with relevant waste and planning policies."
Torfaen members added that even though MBT might be an option for the council to divert waste from landfill in future, approval of the planning application did not "confirm any preference for the council's method of dealing with waste in the future."
The council went on to explain that it deemed the proposal acceptable in terms of its implications on issues such as traffic, visual appearance, odour and noise.
The report said: "The proposal is considered an acceptable development at this industrial estate for what can be considered an industrial process to all intents and purposes."
Commenting on receiving planning permission for the MBT facility,
Shanks managing director Ian Goodfellow said he believed the facility would help South Wales to divert waste from landfill.
He said: "We are clearly delighted that this planning application has been approved. We feel that Shanks' MBT technology will go a long way to ensuring that the South East Wales region is capable of meeting Wales' challenging recycling and diversion targets."
Over the coming months Shanks will now start work to remover the existing plant and buildings from the site whilst commencing the process of securing appropriate contracts.

Waste Management Facility at Pontypool, S.E. Wales

http://www.planapps.torfaen.gov.uk/

View the Non Technical Summary of the Planning Application and Environmental Statement

Non Technical Summary (view)

Browse the Contents of the Planning Application and Environmental Statement DVD by Volume

Volume 1 Planning Application (view)

Volume 2 Environmental Statement (view)

Volume 3a Phase I Environmental Assessment (view)

Volume 3b Phase II Environmental Site Assessment and Instusive Site Investigation Report (view)

Volume 4 Human Heath Risk Assessment (view)

Volume 5 Hydrogeological Risk Assessment (view)

Volume 6 Ecological Risk Assessment (view)

Volume 7 Remedial Options Appriasal and Preliminary Remedial Strategy (view)